AR EN

Eng. Muhlhel Ali Al-Fakih — 2010

Hayyiz Theory

نظرية الحيّز

A theory of multiple perceptual domains: a new framework that redefines the relationship among time, space, event, and observer.

Core principles

Analytical cases

Transfer modes

Section One

From Spacetime to Hayyiz

In 1905, Einstein demonstrated that time and space form a single fabric. Hayyiz Theory proposes that this fabric is still incomplete.

Spacetime

Time + space
One fabric, one observer, one governing frame.
Einstein proved it is relative, shaped by speed and gravity.

→

Hayyiz

Time + space + event
A triadic, multiple framework specific to each entity.
It is determined by the nature of the entity and its cognitive capacity.

Spacetime (Einstein) ⊂ Hayyiz

Spacetime is a special case within hayyiz. Einstein remains valid, but inside a broader interpretive frame.

Section Two

The Three Components: Time, Space, and Event

Why is the event an independent component rather than a branch of time?

A reader may ask: if an event is something that happens, does the act of happening not already imply time? And if so, does time become part of the event, bringing us back to the same problem? This question is fundamental, and the answer is key to understanding the theory.

Temporal vessel

Time

Answers the questions “when?” and “how long?” It is the temporal frame that contains the event, not a part of the event itself.

Spatial vessel

Space

Answers the question “where?” It is the dimensional frame that contains the event.

Content

Event

Answers the question “what?” It is the change in an entity from one state to another, with an existence distinct from both vessels.

Illustrative Analogy

The relation among the three is like the relation among water, a cup, and a table. Water, the event, has its own properties such as density, composition, and temperature regardless of the cup, the temporal vessel, or the table, the spatial vessel. The same water may occupy a small cup or a large bucket. The content remains the same while the vessel changes.

Evidence from the Theory Itself

The Story of the Village Man: One Event Across Different Domains

“The donkey’s death” is one event, a transition from life to death. That event unfolded across one hundred years in one domain. Yet the food beside him did not undergo the same event, even though it shared the same time and place. If time were part of the event, the food would have changed as the donkey changed. It did not. This indicates that the event is independent of time.

Moses and Al-Khidr: Event Precedes Time and Space

The meeting point was not specified by time or place but by an event, the loss of the fish. The event was determined before it materialized in a particular time and place. Here the event generated time and space rather than the reverse. If time were part of the event, the event could not precede and define it.

The Transfer of the Throne of Bilqis: One Event with Different Times

The event is one: transferring the throne from Ma'rib to Jerusalem. The event itself remains identical. What changes radically is the time required: ten days for Solomon, five hours for the Ifrit, and less than a second for the one who had knowledge of the Book. If time were part of the event, the event itself would differ in every case. It does not. This proves their independence.

This distinction is what fundamentally separates Hayyiz Theory from Einstein’s framework. Einstein united the two vessels, time and space, into a single fabric, and that remains correct. But he did not ask about the content. He did not treat the event as a structural component. Hayyiz Theory argues that content, the event, is no less essential than the two vessels, and that understanding their relation is the key to understanding multiple domains.

Section Three

The Fifteen Principles

The structural foundations of Hayyiz Theory

Triadic Composition

Hayyiz is built from three structural components: time, space, and event. The event is not merely something occurring inside spacetime; it is part of the structure itself.

Multiplicity of Domains

There is no single absolute domain. Domains are multiple, and each entity carries its own domain. Hayyiz is an entity-bound property, not an external condition.

Perspective and Truth

Every observer perceives a true but partial perspective. Complete truth is the total of all perspectives, and fully known only to God.

Perceptual Relativity

The ratio of time between two domains is governed by the difference in informational processing capacity. As capacity increases, perceived time stretches.

Relative Balance

Entities within the same domain reach a relative equilibrium that allows stable interaction, analogous to thermal balance but applied to time.

Separation and Union

Domains can separate, intersect, and merge. Sudden union between separated domains can create severe disturbance.

Memory as a Bridge

Memory is the mechanism that links domains. Forgetting is a broken bridge; recollection reconnects the event-domain with the domain of remembrance.

Unperceived Existence

Failure to perceive a domain does not negate its existence. Unperceived domains remain real beyond the observer’s range.

Entity-Specific Independence

Every entity possesses its own independent domain. Multiple entities may share a location while operating through distinct domains at the same moment.

Multiple Transfer Paths

Movement between two points may occur through different domains as passageways. Transfer speed depends on the domain used rather than on the transported object.

Permeability Between Domains

Domains are not fully isolated. Certain effects can pass from one domain to another, and permeability may be one-way.

Domain Specification

A distinct domain can be assigned to each entity, even in the same location. Domain is a property inseparable from the entity itself.

Event as a Primary Coordinate

An event can generate time and space rather than merely being placed within them. In some domains, time and space are determined by the event.

The Domain Barrier

A barrier can be formed to separate two domains completely, preventing transfer, perception, and observation. Matter may function as a medium for such separation.

Means and Enablement

Between domains lie passageways called means. Reaching them requires enablement rather than physical effort. Each domain operates under its own laws.

Section Four

A Preliminary Mathematical Formulation

An initial model linking perceived time to the observer’s cognitive capacity

T(perceived) = T(physical) × f(P)

T(perceived)

Time as perceived by the observer

T(physical)

Measured physical time

f(P)

A function of the observer’s cognitive and informational processing capacity

The relationship between processing capacity and time estimation is logarithmic rather than linear. This helps explain why a sleeper does not perceive years passing, why intense focus can stretch a moment, and why entities of extraordinary capacity may compress years into seconds. This is still a preliminary formulation and requires further development across additional variables, including the nature of the entity, the type of domain, and the degree of permeability between domains.

Section Five

Analytical Applications

Testing the theory against phenomena that the conventional frame struggles to explain

The Transfer of Bilqis’s Throne

Multiple transfer paths

One task was presented to three entities: Solomon, the Ifrit, and the one endowed with knowledge of the Book. The throne did not change; what changed was the domain through which it traveled. The transfer was not accelerated materially. The domain itself was changed.

The Companions of the Cave

Separation, union, and permeability

Four temporal estimations surround the same event: a day or part of a day, three hundred solar years, three hundred and nine lunar years, and a fourth estimation known fully only to God. Sleep suspended their center of temporal sensing but preserved logical memory. Their turning with the sun proves that some influences remain permeable across domains.

The One Who Passed by the Ruined Town

Domain specification and entity-specific independence

One observer in one place, yet four distinct domains: the man, his food, his donkey, and the town. Each followed a separate trajectory. This shows that domain is entity-specific and may differ even within one location.

Moses and Al-Khidr

Event as primary coordinate and structural mismatch

The appointment was set not by time or place but by an event, the loss of the fish. The event generated the coordinate. Then Moses and Al-Khidr occupied the same apparent time and place while perceiving through different domains, one of appearance and one of hidden meaning.

Dhul-Qarnayn

Means, enablement, and the domain barrier

He was granted the means, that is, access to domain pathways. Each station revealed a different world, different people, and different governing conditions. The barrier he built can be read as domain-based rather than merely material.

Pharaoh and the Means

The inverse case of means and enablement

Pharaoh attempted to reach the “means” through material construction. Hayyiz Theory reads this as a category error: domain pathways are not reached by building upward, but through enablement.

The Night Journey and Ascension

The most complete model of domain transfer

A spatial transition from Makkah to Jerusalem, then movement through multiple domains, followed by a return, all within part of a single night. It gathers the theory’s major elements in one event.

Section Six

Classification of Domain Transfer

Six modes of transfer distilled from the analytical reading

Type	Description	Example
Natural daily transfer	A recurrent transition available to every human being	Sleep and waking
Natural compulsory transfer	A one-time transition for every living being	Death and barzakh
Enabled transfer	Granted through direct divine enablement	Dhul-Qarnayn, the Ascension
Transfer through special knowledge	Enabled by knowledge granted to a specific entity	The one who had knowledge of the Book
Transfer through intrinsic capacities	Enabled by natural capacities of the entity	The Ifrit among the jinn
Forced transfer	Occurs by divine command without the entity’s choice	The Companions of the Cave, the village man

Section Seven

Results

Before creation there was neither time nor space. God alone existed, creating all domains and encompassing them completely.

Every perspective belonging to any observer is relative, except that of the Creator who sees all domains from beyond them.

The relation between observer and observed is comprehensive, touching all parts and dimensions at once.

Relative unity among observers creates balance and stability that permit interaction.

The multiplicity of domains is the secret behind transitions and actions that appear extraordinary to the human mind.

Domains are hierarchically ordered, and that gradation relates to knowledge and nearness to the Divine.

Current physics does not yet offer an adequate explanatory model for some beings whose existence is affirmed in revelation, including the jinn, which points to the need for a broader framework for unfamiliar domains.

Section Eight

Library

A compressed video briefing, an audio discussion, and one English presentation deck are now available.

VIDEO

Video Presentation

A visual briefing that introduces the theory and presents its structure in a concise format.

Open file

AUDIO

Audio Discussion

An audio discussion that walks through the theory and clarifies its central idea in a parallel listening track.

Open file

PDF

Presentation Deck

A short presentation explaining the key concepts and intended meaning of the theory.

Open file

Section Nine

Open Questions and Research Horizons

Questions awaiting further scholarly development

What is the full mathematical form of the cognitive-capacity function f(P), and which variables govern it most precisely?

Can permeability between domains be measured quantitatively, and what determines its direction and intensity?

What is the exact relation between hayyiz and consciousness? Is consciousness a condition for domain formation, or independent from it?

How might laboratory experiments be designed to test perceptual relativity under controlled conditions?

What exactly are the “means” or domain pathways, and can they be classified and studied systematically?

How does domain specification interact with thermodynamics and quantum theory?

What is the relation between Hayyiz Theory and multidimensional frameworks such as string theory or parallel-universe models?

Eng. Muhlhel Ali Al-Fakih

Hayyiz Theory — نظرية الحيّز

2010